Jump to content

Filtration of a plant-only tank... is it necessary?


Martin
 Share

Recommended Posts

Happy Thankgiving all!

Just as the title says.  I'm basically considering using a spare tank as a nursery.  All of my tanks do have bladder snails and I am assuming those will likely make their way into this tank as well, but apart from that, the plan is plants-only.  That being said, is filtration a necessary thing?  I just wasn't sure if a stagnant tank was good or not.  Thanks guys!

Martin

Edited by Martin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't have to filter a plant only tank. Heck, you don't have to filter a tank with growing plants in it. What you do need is water movement. The easiest way to achieve this is with an air stone, or a power head that has a venturi nozzle. Personally, I'd go with the air stone. One thing you will have to do is fertilize. Since you won't have fish in there to "feed the  plants". If you want to do this super easy mode, I would suggest you grow emersed. Your get faster growth, thus more plant material to work with. The  you don't have to worry about algae, which is a legitimate concern  when dosing ferts. There is the issue of melt when plants go from above to below the water line. Honestly though, you'll have so much plant material that it will be worth it.

Edited by Expectorating_Aubergine
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If my tank of 75 gallons were plants only without fish and invertebrates I would still run the filter for flow, and the surface skimmer to prevent the surface residue film. I would also continue to run my air stone at night when the plants actually consume oxygen instead of producing it. That said I've seen beautiful aquaria, especially 180 and 200 gallon tanks without any of these where it was just the plants maintained by liquid fertilizer and root tabs. If you are looking to run a heavily planted tank without livestock, and filtration I recommend looking into Diana Walstad's book. Just running a plant only tank does not eliminate the worry about algae, unless proper fertilization is offered and all nutrients, as well as correct lighting to satisfy the plants' needs, the algae will still find a way to outcompete the plants and become a problem, even if just one missing nutrient is the only limiting factor.

Edited by Jungle Fan
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate to disagree with replies above, but I have a moderately 5.5 gallon tank on my desk that doesn't have a filter or air movement.  The only thing on it that requires power is a light.  It's been running since June of last year and doing just fine.  I change one gallon of water every week to ten days.

Shrimp are thriving, and it currently also has seven juvenile endlers, though I'll almost certainly bring them home when I'm not at work over the holidays.  As a disclaimer, with heavier stocking I'm not sure it would work.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

My 10 gallon project tank has also been running sans filter for almost two years. Incorporating sand, bladder snails, plants and various forms of light, the only long term issue is the accumulation of snail detritus.  This past April, an air stone was added briefly to break up a heavy surface biofilm.  The film occurred about the same time that lights began to fail.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...