Jump to content

TheDukeAnumber1

Members
  • Posts

    836
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8
  • Feedback

    0%

Posts posted by TheDukeAnumber1

  1. 39 minutes ago, Mr. Ed's Aquatics said:

    I'll be just as straight with you, I disagree with what you are saying. I've both lived in quake zones and worked construction. And worked on repairing damage caused by quakes. And from what everyone I interacted with said and my own experience, the main benefit of cinder block exterior walls was that they would more often than not ...shift, crack, move, whatever where rigid construction tended to collapse. 

    When a quake struck my area and I didn't lose tanks on cinder block stands, they did the same thing as construction walls. Some blocks moved, maybe even cracked, but the structure as a whole stayed up.  Its like you think that not adding rebar negates the effects of gravity, friction and enormous down force. Build one and try to push it over, or take out the bottom brick. I don't know why you don't think that the same beneficial effects would translate but since I witnessed it I am going with my eyes over your opinion. 

    Also if the codes were only for strength, they would require steel beam construction which is even stronger. But its rigid, and would be like traditional construction and be more likely to collapse.  Much like my 150 on a steel stand is more likely to tip over during a quake due to its high center of gravity and inflexibility. 

    Adults are free to disagree, you think I'm wrong. Okay great, don't listen to me or my advice. I think you're wrong, and I will follow my own advice and just not follow yours.

    And structural engineering is my profession, this isn't my opinion, this is data from the codes and design guides used to design these structures. I did not say the codes were only for strength and you definitely have some misconceptions about rigid strutures.

    "Enourmous down force" will be beneficial for resisting wind loads but it does nothing to help you against earthquake loads. The greater the weight of the structure the greater the earthquake load it carries. Also, again, I'm not telling you not to use CMU blocks, I'm just saying that CMU doesn't have some special structural property that makes it better for stack block shelves in earthquakes. When reinforced masonry walls are designed, believe it or not, it's the steel that's designed to yield and absorb the seismic energy.

    Also we don't disagree about using cinder block shelves, I already agreed they will probably be fine in most cases. We can't have a conversation if you read in disagreement where there isn't.

  2. I'm just going to be straight with you Ed, what you said was wrong. Specific jurisdictions may require reinforced CMU construction over wood framed for specific structures but that in no way translates to just stacked cinder blocks for a shelf. It's not even in the ballpark. And when it comes to a structures ability to "shift and flex" instead of collapsing, wood building construction performs much better than reinforced masonry. (pulling that info from the code)

    I'm glad the cinder block shelves have worked for you and sorry the wood did not, and I'm not telling you that building shelves that way is unsafe or doesn't have advantages...yet (maybe I'll eventually take the time to run the calcs), but anecdotal evidence is just that, anecdotal. And when it comes to earthquake resistance, it's the connection detailing that really makes the difference.

  3. I generally agree with Cory's rant, but I do believe that you could probably get a significant increase in seismic resistance on the cheap with some well placed metal strap bracing.

    If you want to get nerdy for a second and see what your seismic risk is according to typical US building codes see below.

    Go here -> https://hazards.atcouncil.org/#/  (note this will only work for US locations)

    1) Select seismic, enter the location and hit enter.

    2) Select ASCE 7-10, Risk Category I, Site Class D

    3) See additional information and check what your SDC letter is and use the table below to see what seismic risk you are in.

    20200830_100321.jpg.25d527a34c30e2922d55d9fa1115bc3c.jpg

     

    @Mr. Ed's Aquatics

    Cinder block walls in those regions will be reinforced with rebar and grouted. Since these shelves are just stacked blocks they offer no real advantage over a similarily sized adequate wood shelf and in all likelyhood are less resistent to earthquakes since wooden shelves are typically fastened together.

  4. 9 minutes ago, DaveSamsell said:

    @TheDukeAnumber1, Very interesting post.  From my vantage point I cannot discern the exact color code on the resistor.  

    Have a question though:  Did you unsolder one leg of the resistor & then check the resistance of the component?  Otherwise, you may be reading a parallel resistance with the motor and not the true value of the resistor itself.  

    Also, is one lead of the resistor 'tack soldered' to the motor housing?  Again, hard to tell from this viewing vantage point.  

    You're right, atm I wrongly thought the motor was isolated across the terminals. It's closer to 50-Ohms. I can confirm the resistor is not attached to the housing, it's only soldered across the terminals.

  5. I've seen questions about the Co-op's nano air pump pop up often so here is a quick teardown of the usb nano air pump.

     

    With half of the out rubber removed we can see two main components, the motor(right) and the pump(left).

    1.jpg.83fccadc6c57c7d114f79fe4607d52e0.jpg

     

    On the bottom of the motor we can see a large 50-Ohm resistor between the terminals. I believe this resistor is there to protect the power supply. When the power is cut off the motor still spins for a moment and can throw some power back at the power supply, this resistor would help eat up that power.

    2.jpg.1f60b977a79dc20cb238ee382aba365a.jpg

     

    On the pump end we find three small screws.

    3.jpg.8feabb7d271d24622af4c81eb315804e.jpg

     

    Once we remove the screws and top we find three small diaphragms that pump up and down when the motor runs.

    4.jpg.919c2734d6da41fde43c74cbb0b6e9c5.jpg

     

     

    Now with the diaphragm rubber removed we can see the motor head piece that moves the diaphragms and on the underside of the top we can see the three small rubber backflow valves. I guess those screws weren't so small after all.

    5.jpg.d299424c3f0f6984d9122e14ff5e9fa4.jpg

     

    And there we have it, the guts of the fabled pump popularized by our beloved Co-op.

    6.jpg.fb8623e851645ad44527180769c1f0da.jpg

     

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 5
  6. I thought it strage to have an aquarium in the bathroom so I never shared, but after seeing todays video with Dean's throne room setup I feel a bit encouraged that maybe it's not so strange after all! Here is my throne room setup. Overview and view from the seat  (❛ᴗ❛) 

    20200816_205050.jpg

    20200816_205105.jpg

    • Like 5
  7. @Dean’s Fishroom

    I'm confused, I don't often rinse but I to strain... Would you consider strained but not rinsed good or do you consider rinsing still important to remove the little salt water left in the sieve?

    Also Dean...... how old is your sieve really? ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)   BTW I enjoy your content on the channel, thanks for sharing your experience.

    https://youtu.be/3WxeqzDNtvU?t=1851

    https://youtu.be/PVMntyRFaA0?t=800

×
×
  • Create New...