Jump to content

CT_

Members
  • Posts

    1,284
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Posts posted by CT_

  1. I figure this is the right place for a random story.

     

    I was cleaning out my HOB today and found 4 shrimp in there trying to weave in and out of the coarse sponge.  2 of them were juviniles and I just dropped them back in the tank.  the other two were tiny babies that i didn't notice until they fell into my sink.  they were too small to scoop up in a spoon so I had to carefully give them something to hold onto and then tap them into a spoon.  after a lot of trial and error I finally got the first one safely in my spoon and set it free in my tank!  I watched it swim away only to get sucked up by a guppy 3 seconds later. 😲 I learned my lesson and released the second tiny baby shrimp into my floating plants.

     

    I feel like i went from a dozen shrimp that I never see to a carpet over run by shrimp in a few weeks.  In any case, I have enough now so I'm not too sad but for whatever reason I was really not expecting that shrimp to get spotted and eaten so fast.

    • Like 1
  2. 19 minutes ago, Fish Folk said:

    We used to use a mag float with scraper attachment. As Brandy said, if hardscape is too close, it is a bother. What we found was that metal needed to be handled carefully, or glass would eventually get scraped. And the plastic Credit Card really gets the job done. 

    Well this gives me an idea.  I'll update if its not a disaster.

  3. 10 hours ago, Fish Folk said:

    It works fine. It will remove algae from the glass surface. Honestly though . . . we just use an old credit card. It does wonders if you don't mind getting your hands wet in the tank. 

    do you use the scraper attachment?  Do you think its necessary?

    I use a magic eraser right now, but the way I have things setup its kind of a pain to get my lid off and get in there and I always seem to miss a spot. 

     

    I like to spend 15min or so in the evening with my nose to the glass just watching whats going on and I always notice a dirty spot then and I don't want to rile everyone up putting my hand in there either.

  4. 8 hours ago, JettsPapa said:

    Do you have an extra tank so you could put the dark ones, that you don't like as well, in a tank by themselves?  You shouldn't have any trouble selling them if there's a store near you that buys from individuals.

    I've got my main tank, my quarantine tank, and I'm setting up a desktop tank.  I could put the best quality that I don't personally like in the quarantine.    Just bad I think are going to my friend's angel fish, and the pretty but not blue are going in the desktop cube.  

     

    I actually don't plan on buying more fish any time soon (we'll see how that actually goes) and shrimp diseases and fish diseases aren't usually the same, so maybe the quarantine can be me "objectively" best shrimp tank, and the display tank can be what I actually like.

  5. 8 hours ago, JettsPapa said:

    I was also culling the really dark ones from my blue tank, but when I mentioned it to the guy inspecting shrimp I'd brought in to sell at the local store he looked at me funny.  It seems "too dark" in blue shrimp isn't a thing, at least not in his opinion or in that store.

    I've been grappling with this too.  I actually like a lighter deep blue vs full dark blue almost black, but it seems like more dark the "higher grade".  I think I'm going to cull to what I like and just sell to whoever wants them when I have too many.  and if no one buys them so be it. 

     

    At this point that's the cart way before the horse though.

    • Like 2
  6. I really wish people wouldn't jump on the smaller metric prefixes so fast.  nano leaves so little space to go for other words.  Across the internet I've seen 20g and less be called nano but I wish >5 to 20ish could be called mini or micro.  And nano could be used for tank sizes that you "shouldn't" keep fish in.  like a 2.5g.  I've seen some amazing sub 5g tanks with a few very tiny fish that I just love but we don't have a commonly used word for those.  I think about the 2.5g long tank in ACO too much.  If there was a how-to video on that tank I'd buy everything in there and remake it at home, but right now they look too intimidating.

  7. If you're worried do as others have suggested and run your water for a min before using it.  Once scale forms in your pipes it won't even be touching the copper. 

    FWIW the scale build up is why lead pipe is "okay" and why your city suddenly changing its water source and not properly treating it (I'm looking at you flint MI) is not okay.

    • Haha 1
  8. 11 hours ago, Cory said:

    Do you have another tank you can move them too? You can always move them back if they turn out to be the right color.

    Yeah they'll hang out in a cull tank in my office for now.  my fear with over culling is more centered around having too small of a breeding group in the main tank as not many babies look blue and a lot of the adults I started with are elderly because I didn't know what to look/ask for.

     

    So my thought was to keep more during my first round of culls.  But genetically which are more "blue"( will have more blue babies) I'm guessing its blue>black>brown>red?

  9. Where do you all set the line on culling?  Now that I have my first babies from "blue dream" parents (they're growing really fast!) I have some obvious culls like red and brows, but I also have a lot of babies that are too dark to color.  They just look black to me.  I'm worried about culling too aggressively because I want my colony to be decent sized first.  Should I just remove obvious off colors and leave the really dark ones alone for now?

    • Like 1
  10. I found airline tubing fits well over the luer end of a syringe  Then just pull the plunger out of the syringe and you have a tiny gravel vac.  If you don't like the little wings at the end you can cut the syringe down with a serrated knife

  11. On 4/1/2021 at 2:59 PM, Dwayne Brown said:

    The weirdest thing that happened to me that I still cant find an explanation for happened a few months ago. I had a big algea problem so after reducing light and doing water changes. I purchased a uv light stick and placed in the hood of my aquarium. Next day all my fish had clamped fins and were lethargic one pf my apistos died the other one never recovered and died a while ago. My tetras had fin rot and ich some even lost their dorsal fins completely and had trouble swimming straight. I removed the light did water changes dosed aquarium salt and next week everything was fine. Last month I had an algea problem again so I bought a uv light filter that is inclosed in a plastic body and its worked out fine. Nothing adversely affecting the fish has happened. Have no idea what caused the incident just wanted to share cause that is by far the most abnormal thing thats ever happened to me in the fish hobby.

     

    On 4/1/2021 at 3:24 PM, FriendlyLoach said:

    Humm, that is weird. Well I think that uv lights are supposed to be in enclosed filters because the light can hurt their eyes. When I used a uv light it was in a case that did not let light out. It also I heard is bad for our eyes. I am not sure though. 

    Those uncovered UV bulbs are intended to go in your sump or in a canister.  they emit a lot of UVC that probably gave your fish really bad radiation burns (sunburns).  UVC does a lot of DNA damage in addition to damage to other parts of the cell. 

     

    • Like 2
  12. 5 hours ago, Patrick_G said:

    I have shrimp in an Aqueon 3g cube with a coop nano filter, cheap clip light, rock and some plants. I’m just doing top offs and they seem to be doing great. 

    Excellent! I'll follow your example 😉

    4 hours ago, KBOzzie59 said:

    As I recall Cory has wintered them over outside with ice covering the tote/pond.  

    This is a good point.  I'll start without a heater and see how I do.  If they do bad I'll add one.  I'm starting with culls anyway.

    • Like 1
  13. So now that my shrimp (neos) are having babies I wanted to take some to work for fun.  I'm thinking of a tiny cube, like 3gallons.  My thinking was something minimal like a rock, on substrate with a slope back to front, 3 mariomo that I've had in a jar since January (not from petco) and maybe a poof of moss, some floaters like salvia and just enough light to keep the salvia and moss growing and taking nitrogen. 

     

    With covid, I'm not at work every day so I'd probably aim for minimal water changes.  I have RO to top off.  I can add automatic feeding if needed. 

     

    Does this sound like a reasonable plan?  Are there other considerations I'm missing?  What's a good tank to buy for this project?  What about heater yes or no (office 68-72F)?  Can I go filterless & airless? 

    • Like 1
  14. 29 minutes ago, Daniel said:

    My theory is not to have overly high expectations from inexpensive test kits. If it close that's okay. What I really want is for the test to be consistent so I can track changes over time.

    Whatever the colors on the printed chart my main goal is to see trends over time. By consistently photographing the test results in the same place and the same light from the same angle, no matter what the 'accuracy', the precision of the readings would be tight enough to see if the parameter was going up, down or staying the same.

    I agree 100% but I do want to know 5 vs 50 nitrates and ph 6.5 vs 7.5. 

    That's why I was so alarmed by seeing a test strip reading of 50 and a liquid test reading of 10.  And similar with the pH.  It looks like I had error that was just in opposite directions, and frankly that first strip test could have been contamination due to user error with the strip.

    I still don't know whats going on with the ph strips vs my liquid test.  The API strips also read much lower for me.  It must be something with my water or lighting or ??. 

     

    I'm doing a lot of this testing with standards etc just to understand the error I should expect and to get error to acceptable level in my hands, hoping it helps others too.  

    • Thanks 1
  15. Oh I forgot to add that what makes reading the color by eye even worse is that your references usually isn't another tube with the same chemicals and known quantities of analyte (like I had in the photo), but colors printed on paper.  the printing process is usually done with some number of dyes (usually 4, I think some processes are more though) and the colors in between are made by stippling.  Since each dye absorbs light differently and differently from your test sample their color can look different under different lighting conditions.  Conversely two tubes with the same nitrate concentrations will always look the same when viewed under the same light.

    • Like 1
  16.  

    8 hours ago, GardenStateGoldfish said:

    Do you usually take the api liquid test kits at half the water volume? That could be why the results are so different? I know math is math but I have heard your not supposed to do that cause it can interfere with the results. Like using 5 drops of each pm 2.5 ml.

    For the nitrate I do.  It's the one I use the most and its also the one that uses the most reagent per test.  And getting a new set of bottles costs half the price of the master kit.  I actually wish Cory would sell the nitrate kit too so I could just grab new bottles in my next order when i run out.

    It's true that scaling things linearly doesn't always work.  For an assay like this you have to get two things right. 

    1) The stoicheometry:  Are the relative abundance of reagents and sample correct.  In this case it does scale linearly ie you can half everything

    2) Assessing color:  By eye is a pretty terrible way but gets you within a factor of 2.  To do this accurately you need to make sure you have the light path correct and are observing the color against the right background (you're actually observing the light coming from the paper transmitted through the tube into your eye).  Since you're observing through the side of the tube the height of the liquid doesn't matter (within reason).  But if you used a wider tube it could look darker or a narrower tube it could look lighter. 

    The best way is to measure assays like this is by measuring [light] absorbance with an instrument like a spectrometer, which can yield very accurate results.

×
×
  • Create New...