I want to thank everyone for their help on this. This group is so darn helpful with so much knowledge and support (I've been reading other threads last night and this morning). I never thought I'd be as fascinated by this as I am (freshwater invertebrates more so than fish). I guess I have my 9-year-old son, who feels the same way, to thank for that since he's the one who asked me to set up a simple tank for him.
I just read Diana Walstad's "Ecology of the Planted Aquarium". I may be getting out over my skis too soon on this considering that I have no experience with aquatic plants, but I'm tempted to jump into that kind of natural, low-tech (if that's the correct term) system. The lower-maintenance appeals to me, but more than that, it's the challenge of the balancing act and adjusting variables to see how things happen. Though, I've also read about frustration and failures at times. I just worry that I'm biting off more than I can chew with my limited experience. I considered a small tank or jar, but I've also read that something a bit larger (~10g) would be an environment that is somewhat more forgiving and less prone to rapid swings because of the larger volume of water.
I know I'm switching topics in this thread (sorry), so I won't carry that discussion too much here. In fact, after more thought and research, I'll likely create a separate topic asking for opinions. For example, from my reading, especially because I'm more interested in shrimp, snails, etc., I worry that fish would complicate matters (as a disruptor for maintaining the others--especially shrimp--unless I can create an environment for them to become inconspicuous), but from what I gather, they seem like they are necessary to provide the nutrients for the plants (or maybe I'm wrong about that). If that's the case, then I'd be looking for fish that are both non-aggressive and resilient. And speaking of resiliency, in the beginning, I'd probably go for that, too, with shrimp; I hear cherry shrimp are a good starter.
As always, thanks!