TheDukeAnumber1 Posted April 27, 2021 Share Posted April 27, 2021 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maggie Posted April 27, 2021 Share Posted April 27, 2021 I said no because it (or an alternative such as shortening) is an essential ingredient in so many recipes. I think of condiments as optional and good, but of you're out of it, you can make do. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted April 27, 2021 Share Posted April 27, 2021 I contend that since butter is an optional topping for popcorn it should be considered a condiment. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemon Posted April 27, 2021 Share Posted April 27, 2021 I'm not sure. but this is a very important question 3 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anita Posted April 27, 2021 Share Posted April 27, 2021 If the USDA maintains that ketchup and pickle relish count as vegetables, then obviously, butter must be a condiment. 🤣 https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1981/09/26/us-holds-the-ketchup-in-schools/9ffd029a-17f5-4e8c-ab91-1348a44773ee/ 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemon Posted April 27, 2021 Share Posted April 27, 2021 new answer I say it depends on what you are using it for. Google definition for condiments "a substance such as salt or ketchup that is used to add flavor to food." so if you are using it on popcorn or corn I say yes but for making cookies or other baked foods where butter is added before the actual baking then no. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celly Rasbora Posted April 27, 2021 Share Posted April 27, 2021 Yes and no. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDukeAnumber1 Posted April 27, 2021 Author Share Posted April 27, 2021 37 minutes ago, Daniel said: I contend that since butter is an optional topping for popcorn it should be considered a condiment. I disagree with the argument there, I'd say that toppings are a distinct category and that do not necessarily make something a condiment too. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted April 27, 2021 Share Posted April 27, 2021 41 minutes ago, TheDukeAnumber1 said: I disagree with the argument there, I'd say that toppings are a distinct category and that do not necessarily make something a condiment too. I am surprised that a man of such judgement and learning could fall for the splitters fallacy. Clearly the existence of other categories does not preclude a thing from being a member of more than one category. Thus: Obviously* 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDukeAnumber1 Posted April 27, 2021 Author Share Posted April 27, 2021 (edited) O Daniel, flattery will get you everywhere, but calling a fallacy early is unwise. A surprise coming from a graybeard held in such high esteem. I am simply pointing out that since "butter = topping" it does not logically follow that "butter = condiment". If you wish to make the argument that "butter = condiment" then you must by another route. 🙂 Edited April 28, 2021 by TheDukeAnumber1 spelling 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lefty o Posted April 27, 2021 Share Posted April 27, 2021 i dont eat butter plain, so it is either an ingredient, or a condiment. topping/condiment , same dang thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted April 27, 2021 Share Posted April 27, 2021 11 minutes ago, TheDukeAnumber1 said: O Daniel, flattery will get you everywhere, but calling a fallacy early is unwise. A surprise coming from a graybeard held in such high esteem. I am simply pointing out that since "butter = topping" it does not logically follow that "butter = condament". If you wish to make the argument that "butter = condament" then you you must by another route. 🙂 Agreed, perhaps we can agree on definitions? According to my trusty OED: I have to pick up sushi for dinner, but when I get back, I will look up toppings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celly Rasbora Posted April 27, 2021 Share Posted April 27, 2021 They use butter on sandwiches like mayonnaise or mustard in certain places. I want to say in Iowa. So in that instance, it’s a condiment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fishdude Posted April 27, 2021 Share Posted April 27, 2021 I am flummoxed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celly Rasbora Posted April 27, 2021 Share Posted April 27, 2021 Or, maybe using Daniel’s dictionary, butter is condimental. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fishdude Posted April 27, 2021 Share Posted April 27, 2021 3 minutes ago, Celly Rasbora said: Or, maybe using Daniel’s dictionary, butter is condimental. I...did not know that condimental was a word. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skipper Posted April 27, 2021 Share Posted April 27, 2021 This thread is amazing. I initially went with no, but the thread has been most thought provoking. I’d have to say one of the many uses for butter is indeed its application as a condiment, but butter is not singularly a condiment. I’m a dietitian, not a linguist 😂 Perhaps @Daniel could be kind enough to post the OED definition of butter to add further clarification to this important issue. Could one say cucumbers are condimental to relish? I need to integrate this word into my vocabulary. Perhaps make an ornate sign for my cucumber patch that reads “condimentals”? May as well turn it into a noun 😂 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemon Posted April 28, 2021 Share Posted April 28, 2021 (edited) this thread is very thought provoking. are there other foods that are a condiment and a ingredient? Edited April 28, 2021 by quirkylemon103 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted April 28, 2021 Share Posted April 28, 2021 Although 'topping' has many meanings, butter doesn't seem to one of them: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted April 28, 2021 Share Posted April 28, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted April 28, 2021 Share Posted April 28, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted April 28, 2021 Share Posted April 28, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted April 28, 2021 Share Posted April 28, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skipper Posted April 28, 2021 Share Posted April 28, 2021 So many definitions. I would never have been able to learn English as a second language. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted April 28, 2021 Share Posted April 28, 2021 32 minutes ago, skipper said: This thread is amazing. I initially went with no, but the thread has been most thought provoking. I’d have to say one of the many uses for butter is indeed its application as a condiment, but butter is not singularly a condiment. I’m a dietitian, not a linguist 😂 Perhaps @Daniel could be kind enough to post the OED definition of butter to add further clarification to this important issue. Could one say cucumbers are condimental to relish? I need to integrate this word into my vocabulary. Perhaps make an ornate sign for my cucumber patch that reads “condimentals”? May as well turn it into a noun 😂 I think the definition of 'butter' goes on for 20 pages... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now